I came up with that phrase during a five segment, about the left obsession and obedience to identity politics. i had never thought about this idea ever before, but now i realize its a real, honest phenomenon. (this is me patting myself on my own back for creating a term to describe it).
so, the idea came a few days after watching a Todd Haynes movie called "Safe," which told the story of a vacuous young woman falling prey to the hysteria of environmental illnesses. The tale takes place in the late 1980s, and having been an editor at Prevention magazine in the early 1990's, I know the experience. The "environmental illness" movement focuses on the concept that everything around you was making you sick. At first, it was foods, then it was chemicals, fillings, shampoos etc - then it was "indoor toxins," and then "outdoor toxins," and so on. Hucksters saw this as an opportunity to sell phony products and supplements, promising to "detoxify" your body. People would fork out thousands of dollars for cult-like cleanses and enemas, or long retreats in the middle of nowhere, to sweat out your poisons.
The movie Safe chronicles this woman descent into this toxic-paranoia - believing everything gets her sick until she ends up in a no-windowed small dome - the safest space on earth, where nothing can touch her.
the moral of this story: if you focus on something like immunity - wondering what's effecting and what's making it worse, you will implode. You will collapse into a world in which only your fears matter.
This is hypochondria at its most crippling.
I saw in this a parallel to identity politics. Your identity is a lot like your immune system -- weak or strong ,it simply exists whether you think about it or not. Its an unconscious action. But, once you start thinking about your identity, and focusing on it - what effects it and what weakens it -- you end up in the same place as a hypochondriac. You are convinced everything out there is harming you! Hence the phrase "societal hypochondria" - a psychological disorder in which everyone around you in some way is harming you, and your only goal is to seek a "safe" space -- that small round enclosure cut off from other people.
When you come across someone afflicted by intersectionality politics, by the identity obsession - you're see someone paralyzed by this hypochondria. they cannot interact like normal humans: because they believe your words, your actions, YOUR identity harms them.
You are like the indoor and outdoor toxins pummeling the person plagued by environmental illnesses.
that's my deep thought for today.
Mark dragged down his Chewbacca from upstairs and wore his favorite mask for Halloween. No negativity surprisingly…. ! He did, however, pay a visit to the liberal house next door and repeatedly yelled, “You’re fired! You’re fired! You’re fired!” I think they actually enjoyed it.
Send help......and a storage unit. He kept the m'fer a secret. Maybe I should come home with a pair of $1000 shoes.
Congratulation to @SGKusmertz, @bek1, and @wilbner. Your questions were chosen for tonight’s Ask Joe and the Panelists.
@SGKusmertz If you could have one song play when you enter a room, what would it be?
@bek1 Do you usually feel excited or stressed out about going back to school after summer break?
@wilbner What was the best prank you’ve ever pulled?
Another milestone...only Part A since I'm still fueling the economy!!! MAGA!!!!
Hakeem Jeffries getting shouted down by a very angry loud constituent, regarding
getting rid of our present president….YOUR PARTY& YOU Hakeem, have sown the seeds of anger & violence. Now look.
Hmm, so 3 "big tech" related stories since the election that have sucked up the news feeds. The philandering chip guy, Outlook (do people still use that?) and now this ground stop. Is this:
1. a distraction from the "unprecedented" extra 20million voters last week?
2. a distraction from the results of, or fact that there's still1 senate and 12 house seats still not called?
3. another intentional event to convince Americans to slow down our tech/AI?
4. the beginning of a coordinated attack on American tech and economics by our adversaries?
5. a way to bog down the Trump admin/republicans for the next 2 months so they can't get anything done while still in power?
I think there's a strong case for 1-4. But if democrats start calling for more "hearings" to look into these things, then that'll confirm they're in cahoots with our adversaries for #5.
Ain't that peculiar.